COPE Statement

International Journal of Arts, Commerce, Science and Technology (IJACST) is committed to responsible scholarly communication, publication ethics, research integrity, editorial transparency and COPE-aligned academic publishing practices.

COPE-Aligned Ethics Framework

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

International Journal of Arts, Commerce, Science and Technology (IJACST) follows a responsible publication ethics framework inspired by the core practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The journal is committed to editorial accountability, transparency standards, research integrity governance and responsible scholarly communication.

IJACST maintains an anti-malpractice publishing environment where originality, ethical authorship, fair peer review, metadata integrity, correction transparency and long-term scholarly record preservation are treated as essential academic responsibilities.

Transparency

Clear publication policies, ethical communication, open access principles and documented editorial procedures.

Accountability

Responsible editorial governance, scholarly decision-making and academic record protection.

Misconduct Prevention

Zero tolerance for plagiarism, fabricated data, duplicate publication and unethical authorship.

Editorial Responsibility

Editorial Responsibility, Autonomy and Academic Neutrality

The Editorial Board of IJACST operates with editorial independence and academic neutrality. Manuscripts are evaluated on scholarly merit, originality, methodological quality, relevance, clarity and ethical compliance, without discrimination based on nationality, gender, institutional affiliation, political belief, religion or personal background.

Unbiased Decision-Making

Editorial decisions are based on research quality, academic contribution and ethical publishing standards.

No Commercial Influence

Editorial decisions remain independent from financial, institutional, political or external pressure.

Confidential Handling

Submitted manuscripts, reviewer identities and editorial communications are handled confidentially.

Editorial Governance Academic Neutrality Scholarly Fairness
Peer Review Integrity

Double-Blind Peer Review and Quality Assurance

IJACST follows a double-blind peer review process to promote unbiased evaluation and academic objectivity. Reviewer and author identities are protected during the evaluation process wherever applicable, and reviewers are selected based on subject expertise, research background and ethical suitability.

Reviewer Anonymity

Double-blind review helps reduce personal bias and supports fair scholarly assessment.

Domain Expert Reviewers

Manuscripts are assessed by reviewers with relevant disciplinary or interdisciplinary expertise.

Audit-Ready Review Archive

Editorial decisions and review communication may be preserved for accountability and policy compliance.

Author Ethical Obligations

Author Responsibilities and Academic Honesty

Authors submitting to IJACST must ensure that their manuscripts are original, properly referenced, plagiarism-free, ethically prepared and not under simultaneous consideration elsewhere. Authors are responsible for accurate data presentation, transparent authorship, conflict disclosure and truthful scholarly communication.

01

Originality and Plagiarism-Free Work

Authors must submit original research and properly cite all sources, data, quotations and reused material.

02

Ethical Authorship

Only contributors with genuine scholarly contribution should be listed as authors. Ghost, guest or honorary authorship is not acceptable.

03

Data Integrity

Fabrication, falsification, manipulation or selective reporting of research data is considered serious misconduct.

04

Conflict Disclosure

Authors must disclose financial, institutional, personal or academic conflicts that may influence the research.

Reviewer Ethical Duties

Peer Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers play a critical role in protecting peer review integrity and academic quality. IJACST expects reviewers to maintain confidentiality, provide objective feedback, avoid personal criticism, disclose conflicts of interest and complete reviews within a reasonable editorial timeline.

Confidential Review

Reviewers must not disclose manuscript content or use unpublished material for personal benefit.

Objective Evaluation

Reviewer comments should be constructive, evidence-based, respectful and academically useful.

Timely Response

Reviewers should complete evaluations within the assigned time or inform the Editorial Office early.

No Bias

Reviewers must avoid bias based on nationality, institution, gender, ideology or personal disagreement.

Conflict Disclosure

Potential conflicts should be declared before accepting review responsibility.

Editorial Decision Ethics

Fair Manuscript Evaluation and Editorial Transparency

IJACST editorial decisions are based on academic relevance, originality, methodological soundness, ethical compliance, reviewer recommendations and contribution to scholarly knowledge. Acceptance, revision or rejection decisions are not influenced by APC payment, institutional affiliation or non-academic pressure.

Merit-Based Decisions Fair Evaluation Documented Communication Editorial Accountability
Misconduct Handling

Research Misconduct, Corrections and Retractions

IJACST takes allegations of research misconduct seriously. Cases involving plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabricated data, manipulated images, authorship misconduct, citation manipulation or unethical research practice may lead to rejection, correction, expression of concern, retraction or institutional notification after evidence-based inquiry.

Plagiarism Handling

Similarity concerns are assessed according to originality, citation quality and ethical research standards.

Duplicate Publication

Previously published or simultaneously submitted work may be rejected or investigated.

Fabricated Data

Fabrication, falsification or manipulation of research data is considered serious academic misconduct.

Corrections

Erratum or corrigendum may be issued for verified errors that do not invalidate core findings.

Retractions

Retraction may be issued when findings are unreliable or serious ethical violation is confirmed.

Formal Inquiry

Authors are given a fair opportunity to respond before final editorial action is taken.

Scholarly Record Integrity

DOI, Metadata and Citation Transparency

IJACST recognizes that published research becomes part of the permanent scholarly record. Corrections, retractions and metadata updates are managed with attention to DOI preservation, citation transparency, version tracking, CrossRef-compatible metadata and Google Scholar discoverability.

DOI Preservation Metadata Continuity Citation Transparency Version Tracking
Open Access & Archiving

Open Access Ethics and Digital Preservation

IJACST supports open access scholarly communication by making published research freely available to readers without subscription barriers. The journal supports digital archiving, DOI persistence, metadata preservation, author rights and long-term research accessibility.

Creative Commons

Published content supports open knowledge sharing under the journal’s open access licensing framework.

Digital Archiving

Published articles are preserved through digital formats and long-term accessibility planning.

Self-Archiving

Authors may deposit permitted versions in institutional repositories with proper citation and DOI link.

Research Integrity Statement

Integrity, Originality and Responsible Publishing

IJACST is committed to originality, ethical publishing, responsible scholarly communication, editorial transparency, academic accountability and long-term research integrity. The journal follows a strong anti-malpractice system to protect authors, reviewers, editors, readers and the scholarly record.

Originality Required
Ethical Scholarship
Academic Accountability
Anti-Malpractice System
Editorial Transparency
Scholarly Trust
Frequently Asked Questions

COPE Statement FAQ

Does IJACST follow COPE guidelines?

IJACST follows responsible publication ethics practices inspired by COPE core principles and ethical scholarly publishing standards.

Is plagiarism checked before publication?

Yes. Manuscripts are checked for originality, citation integrity and plagiarism concerns before publication consideration.

What is double-blind peer review?

Double-blind peer review means author and reviewer identities are protected to reduce bias and support fair scholarly assessment.

Can articles be retracted?

Yes. Articles may be retracted when serious ethical issues, unreliable findings, plagiarism or duplicate publication are confirmed.

Does IJACST preserve DOI metadata?

Yes. IJACST supports DOI metadata integrity, citation transparency and long-term scholarly record preservation.

Is IJACST an open access journal?

Yes. IJACST is an international open access peer-reviewed refereed journal.

Ethical Publishing Commitment

Publish With Ethical Scholarly Standards

Submit your manuscript to IJACST through a transparent, peer-reviewed, open access and research-integrity-focused academic publishing platform.

Chat with Editor